AutoShorts vs Faceless.video
Two tools that run no-camera channels on autopilot. Close in price, different in billing and channel limits.
The short answer
AutoShorts and Faceless.video both automate evergreen no-camera channels for around $15 to $19 a month to start. AutoShorts charges by posting frequency on one account. Faceless.video charges per channel, which it calls a series. Choose AutoShorts for a single cheap channel with flat pricing; choose Faceless.video if its niche templates fit your idea.
AutoShorts vs Faceless.video, side by side
Prices and features as of July 2026.
| Capability | AutoShorts | Faceless.video |
|---|---|---|
| Creates no-camera videos from scratch | OK | OK |
| Entry price | $19/mo | $15/mo |
| Pricing model | Per account | Per channel |
| Annual discount | ✕ | OK |
| Auto-posts to TikTok, YouTube, Reels | OK | OK |
| Evergreen niche templates | OK | OK |
| Voice cloning | OK | OK |
| Multi-language | OK | OK |
| Several channels on one plan | Limited | ✕ |
| Best for | One cheap channel | Niche template channels |
Looking for a news-first alternative?
Both tools focus on evergreen content. Ravenclip focuses on current news, with breaking-news triggers and on-screen graphics.
Know what you are getting
AutoShorts vs Faceless.video: which is better?
They are close. AutoShorts is better for a single cheap channel with flat, account-level pricing. Faceless.video is better if one of its niche templates fits your idea or you want an annual discount, though it charges per channel.
Is AutoShorts or Faceless.video cheaper?
Faceless.video starts a little lower, around $15 a month as of July 2026, with an annual discount, but per channel. AutoShorts starts around $19 with flat pricing. For a network of channels, AutoShorts can work out cheaper.
Do both auto-post to social media?
Yes. Both publish no-camera videos to TikTok, YouTube Shorts, and Instagram Reels on a schedule.
Today's news could already be posted
Both tools do evergreen. Ravenclip posts real news on autopilot.